[MOVIE] History of the World, Part I (1981) 816p BluRay.RARBG x264 AAC6ch 988MB [Dir.: Mel Brooks]

gazongagizmo | 46 points | Jan 23 2018 16:00:04

[MOVIE] History of the World, Part I (1981) 816p BluRay.RARBG x264 AAC6ch 988MB [Dir.: Mel Brooks] | Megalinks MegaDB [MOVIE] History of the World, Part I (1981) 816p BluRay.RARBG x264 AAC6ch 988MB [Dir.: Mel Brooks]

History of the World, Part I | Megalinks MegaDB History of the World, Part I

Possibly not the proper RARBG rip... I grabbed this from openload (via some video streaming site), so maybe there was another recode process involved.

I muxed English subtitles, and included Spanish ones as an SRT file. On the subtitles sites the fitting release name was CINEFILE, in case you'll look for other languages.

MEDIAINFO

IMDB

~ BASE 64 encrypted link & key | Megalinks MegaDB BASE 64 encrypted link & key

~ decode the following two parts at https://www.base64decode.org/ , add https://mega in front of the decoded link bit, and finally put the decoded key after the decoded link

LINK:

Lm56LyNGIUFjaGdDU0tC

KEY:

IXZSQ191LUFYcUZtTmtONW52b3ZqOEE=

[-] C_McButterpants | 6 points | Jan 23 2018 19:56:49

816p. lol

[-] commit_bat | 3 points | Jan 24 2018 04:12:27

Many "1080p" videos are not actually 1080 pixels high because their aspect ratio is not 16:9. It would make more sense to call them by their FullHD width of 1920 pixels but this the terminology we're stuck with.

[-] gazongagizmo | -1 points | Jan 24 2018 09:12:47

but this the terminology we're stuck with

Actually no, the marketing people saw it fit to call it 4K | Megalinks MegaDB 4K, refering to 4096*2160. Should've been 2160p, but maybe they wanted to suggest to the potential buyers an even greater leap than simply twice the vertical size over 1080p

[-] commit_bat | 2 points | Jan 24 2018 09:46:37

This doesn't make what I said wrong. Secondly if you're going to be pedantic you should at least know that 4K movies are 3840 pixels wide, so their label is wrong too.

[-] C_McButterpants | 4 points | Jan 24 2018 12:51:08

Well, just to throw a spanner in the works, you're both right...

'Cinema' 4K = 4096
'UHD' (consumer) 4k = 3840

Blame it on the Digital Cinema Initiatives group. They're only concerned with the width that a projector throws; and the height takes care of itself. Personally I think they should have stuck with vertical nomenclature in the consumer space and called 2160p 2K — making the new 8K screens 4K.

[-] commit_bat | 1 points | Jan 24 2018 13:48:31

You know what, I'll take it.

[-] gazongagizmo | 0 points | Jan 24 2018 14:05:43

I never was invested anyway

[-] KokiriEmerald | 1 points | Jan 24 2018 02:37:53

I didn't even know that was a thing