[MOVIE] Dunkirk.2017.2160p.BluRay.x265.10bit.HDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-TERMiNAL [16.64GB]

vcdupper | 53 points | Jan 20 2018 18:35:02

[MOVIE] Dunkirk.2017.2160p.BluRay.x265.10bit.HDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-TERMiNAL [16.64GB] | Megalinks MegaDB [MOVIE] Dunkirk.2017.2160p.BluRay.x265.10bit.HDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-TERMiNAL [16.64GB]

Allied soldiers from Belgium, the British Empire and France are surrounded by the German Army, and evacuated during a fierce battle in World War II.

SOURCE & SCREENS

IMDb 8.1

TRAILER

BASE 64 ENCRYPTED / PROTECTED MEGA LINK
aHR0cDovL2xpbmtzLnNuYWhwLml0Lzg2MGR1bms=

BASE 64 ENCODED DECRYPTION KEY
IVdMdmFjRGRmc0lDMy10X2hwM2tqUXZaTHJ5dlMyZlFwdlh0NmN3c3gxckE=

Video: ID : 1
Format : HEVC
Format/Info : High Efficiency Video Coding
Format profile : Main [email protected]@High
Codec ID : V_MPEGH/ISO/HEVC
Duration : 1 h 46 min
Bit rate : 19.8 Mb/s
Width : 3840 pixels
Height : 2160 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 23.976 (24000/1001) FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 (Type 2)
Bit depth : 10 bits
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.100
Stream size : 14.8 GiB (89%)
Audio:
ID : 2
Format : DTS
Format/Info : Digital Theater Systems
Format profile : MA / Core
Codec ID : A_DTS
Duration : 1 h 46 min
Bit rate mode : Variable / Constant
Bit rate : 2411 kb/s / 1509 kb/s
Channel(s) : 6 channels
Channel positions : Front: L C R, Side: L R, LFE
Sampling rate : 48.0 kHz
Frame rate : 93.750 FPS (512 SPF)
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossless / Lossy
Stream size : 1.80 GiB (11%)
Language : English
Default : Yes
Forced : No

[-] Puptentjoe | 3 points | Jan 20 2018 19:12:00

For the people in the know can you visually tell the difference between this and a 2160 remux? Noticeable or just a little difference?

[-] odellusv2 | 5 points | Jan 20 2018 20:58:02

very noticeable compression artifacts on larger screens (40"+) versus the remux.

[-] kormer | 2 points | Jan 20 2018 23:25:36

Just so I'm not misreading you, you're saying the remux from a few weeks ago is the better version?

[-] odellusv2 | 4 points | Jan 21 2018 03:10:20

yes. remuxing means taking the video/audio from the disc and putting it in a new container (almost always mkv); the video and audio are the same quality as an untouched copy of the disc, it just usually means that it lacks extras and sometimes certain audio streams. so remuxes are the same quality as untouched, therefore they are the best quality available.

[-] Infamous1869 | 1 points | Jan 21 2018 16:54:46

since it seems like you know about this stuff, can you help me finding a player to run this? in the past I've downloaded 2160p video files and VLC won't cut it. I've done research, and I realized VLC lacks in the codecs department. What do you use personally? I'm relatively new to all this, so if necessary links to guides would be greatly appreciated.

[-] Eucbevt | 1 points | Jan 21 2018 20:42:21

I recently switched over to MPC-BE and it works really well.

[-] odellusv2 | 1 points | Jan 21 2018 21:47:57

i use MPC-HC with madVR and ReClock.

[-] franchiceddhu | 1 points | Jan 21 2018 00:15:34

Same for me!

[-] jaxpacific | 2 points | Jan 24 2018 02:15:59

*Barely noticeable. These CRF17 encodes are incredibly good especially when in motion. I've tried watching these 4ft away from a 65" and I had a really hard time telling the difference. I'm a stickler for quality and even I can't justify the remux file sizes, but if you have the storage and bandwidth to spare by all means get the remux as it is fat and away the best quality you can get. I unfortunately am limited on both so to get 90% the quality for 1/3rd the file size is a very compelling option to me. I'm just happy there are great options out there for both file types.