Good job man

permalink

So I've posted about this before and I guess no one gave a damn or saw it..

Upvotes and feedback are poor metrics. If you want to see how many people actually grab your offerings put the link on snahp.it. When you visit that snahp.it link later it will show you a visit counter after you get past the password/captcha.

Remember the 1/9/90 rule. Using snahp.it has shown me that it's fairly accurate. My most-popular submission has (last time I checked) 202 upvotes and most of the replies were to ask about compatibility problems. Snahp.it visits? 1305. Give it a try.

permalink

I use a vpn to get around the the download limit.

permalink

The official megasync client will pause when you hit the limit and then resume whenever it's ready. So it might take some time but you'll get the download eventually. It's not a perfect program but it gets the job done.

permalink

i use Real-Debrid. It doesn't have a limit for MEGA

permalink

[deleted]

permalink

i pay £5 and i get to download 1tb lol

permalink

Apple doesn't support .mkv, which is a pity as almost all the files here are in mkv containers.You have to install a third party player or convert the files to .mp4.Just one more reason not to buy apple I guess.

permalink

Get the VLC app

permalink

Use a computer to use mega. Then convert it with like handbrake or whatever.

permalink

ffmpeg -i input.mkv -acodec copy -vcodec copy output.mp4

Only you ONLY downloads 100 odd gbs lol

permalink

[deleted]

permalink

It depends on a few things. Encoding is like dancing - there are many ways to dance but not all of them look good. Whether or not grain (and how much of it) appears in an encode will depend on the source movie, any filters applied by the encoder, the codec (x264 or x265, etc) and tuning. Grain can be distracting if there's a lot of it but if an encoder removes it too aggressively it can and will also remove fine details.

A notorious example of bad grain removal is the Predator: Ultimate Hunter Edition blu-ray. The studio used DNR (digital noise reduction) to try to remove the grain but it was so aggressive it wiped out much of the fine details. It isn't particularly noticeable for most of the movie but it really stands out in any close-ups of Carl Weathers - his face looks slightly out of focus and has no pores.

The counterpoint to Predator: Ultimate Hunter Edition is Aliens. They also tried to remove the grain but did so with much greater care and had much better results. When the movie was released in the 2000 Alien Anthology dvd set it was covered in grain (a result of the film stock the movie was shot on.) When the Alien Anthology was re-released on blu-ray in 2010 they did the grain removal and the movie looks fantastic.

The look of James Cameron's Aliens, comparatively, may be slightly divisive. Fans will no doubt remember the director's remarks, a few months ago, concerning the film's remaster:

"It's spectacular. We went in and completely de-noised it, de-grained it, up-rezzed, color-corrected every frame, and it looks amazing. It looks better that it looked in the theaters originally. Because it was shot on a high-speed negative that was a new negative that didn't pan out too well and got replaced the following year. So it's pretty grainy. We got rid of all the grain. It's sharper and clearer and more beautiful than it's ever looked."

The statement understandably got people—videophiles especially—riled up, envisioning Aliens DNR'ed into oblivion, much like the recent Predator: Ultimate Hunter Edition. Well, rest easy—not all of the grain has been removed. There are scenes where it's definitely apparent that some noise reduction has been used, but most of the time the image still appears natural and filmic. That is, grain isn't "frozen" in place, and there's none of the smeary, blurry quality you normally associate with heavy-handed DNR. There are a few shots where faces take on a mildly waxy look, but these are thankfully rare. In this case, noise reduction has been used selectively and—for the most part—unobtrusively. The film certainly looks better than it ever has. While fine detail is sometimes limited by the graininess of the original high-speed negative, the leap in clarity from DVD to Blu-ray is immediately appreciable. Black levels aren't quite as tight this time around, but color is strong and there's a nice sense of depth in the 1.85:1-framed picture. (Aliens was the only film to be shot in this ratio. All the others are in 2.39:1.) A solid presentation, overall, but not quite as impressive as Alien.

So, after all that... grain in an encode suggests that the encoder didn't alter the picture much. Further, x265 tends to do a better job of preserving grain than x264. You might ask yourself if you prefer a clearer image no matter what, or if you more strongly prefer watching a film as it was originally seen by audiences.

permalink

For the shadowban problem - does your other account have enough karma to post here? 10 comment karma is the minimum otherwise your posts don't show. if you've got the karma you might be getting picked up in the subs spam filter somehow.

permalink

x265 can get bit rate savings up to about %50-60, however, the codec shines at lower bit rates than higher ones. So your 10gb x264 rip will look exactly the same as a 10gb x265 rip. This is why most x265 torrents are quite small.

It's your choice really.

permalink

I think x265 is,realistically, only 20-30% more more efficient so your 10g x264 file will be much better quality than the 3g x265 one.

permalink

The best quality you can get for SG-1 is 576p which is the Pal dvd resolution.

permalink

What are the horror movies?

permalink

Hmm...I am interested in the horror movies as well as The IT Crowd series, if they are better quality than the ones that I have. :)

permalink

IT Crowd in higher quality would be dope.

permalink

Fam I need that IT Crowd. Please post it!

permalink

x265 from what i can assume is just a much more efficient way to "pack" certain files which makes them smaller but have the same quality

permalink

its hit and miss. sometimes you can download more than 5 gb, sometimes less. it all depends on their server load

permalink

No, there's no way you can do that. What you can do is report that comment directly to the mods. We will delete the comment and warn the user.

permalink

Browsers already have a base64 encoder/decoder built-in. Use these bookmarks to invoke those built-in functions:

Decode selected text: Use this to decode a base64 encoded string in-place (Source)

javascript:function c(){}c.prototype.get=function(){var a="";window.getSelection?a=window.getSelection().toString():document.selection&&"Control"!=document.selection.type&&(a=document.selection.createRange().text);return a};c.prototype.set=function(a){if(window.getSelection){var b=window.getSelection();b.rangeCount&&(b=b.getRangeAt(0),b.deleteContents(),b.insertNode(document.createTextNode(a)))}else document.selection&&document.selection.createRange&&(b=document.selection.createRange(),b.text=a)};try{var d=new c,e=atob(d.get());d.set(e)}catch(a){alert(a.message)};

Decode entered text: Use this to input a base64 encoded string and get the decoded string back (Source)

javascript: try{var sText=prompt("Enter base64 encoded string: "),decodedText=atob(sText);prompt("Base64 decoded string:",decodedText)}catch(a){alert(a.message)};

JS code snippets I've posted are minified. I've added the source links for reference.

How to add these as bookmarks in Chrome

Sample Base64 text: U2FtcGxlIEJhc2U2NCB0ZXh0

permalink

Must be just on your end. Base64decode is working find for me.

permalink

I find when that happens, I have to restart the mega client, and it goes right back up. Issue in their programing I think.

permalink

they say bandwidth can be restricted due to overall bandwidth levels as well as bandwidth on speicific shares. Could just be a case of the file(s) you're grabbing are high traffic ones and it's kicking the limit in

permalink

2 GB/s? Gigabytes per second? Are you sure? That's literally a 16Gbps connection you've got there. Impossible.

permalink

I use NordVPN. Bought the two year subscription at ~$3/month. Works like a charm!

permalink

The more servers the vpn company has the better.Otherwise it only takes one person in the world to use up the 5g available for each ip address every 6 hours.Probably cheaper to buy Mega pro lite if you just want to get around the download limit.

permalink

tunnel bear

permalink

they fixed the error/loophole back in early autumn or so. Have to pay, or change IP address every 4-6 gigs now.

permalink

megasync. it does files >5GB no problems. Can start/stop/pause/resume as well.

permalink

i think i know what the problem, you need to cut this part of link: ( https://www. ) for me this works

permalink

I don't know why it is different for different people but I can still download 50g at a time with megadownloader & it will start files of any size.Just like before they fixed the "loophole".Absolutely no idea why it still works for me which doesn't help you though.

permalink

Minimum specs you want if buying new is hardware decoding. Fire stick does 8 bit hevc I think. The new fire tv 4k does 10 bit 4k hevc, I have one it works great to supplement our shield

permalink

People have posted that Kodi is able to play x265 10bit and I think 12bit as well.

permalink

https://www.reddit.com/r/megalinks/comments/6vw6xe/meta_list_of_websites_which_provide_megalinks/

permalink

Looks like it already came out https://www.dvdsreleasedates.com/movies/6474/It-2017.html

permalink

check igg-games and pcdownload-games, just google those ones

permalink

Wrong thread

permalink

Isn't waifu2x only viable for cartoons?

permalink

You are in the wrong thread, bro. This isn't the request thread, lol.

permalink