ecchh | 129 points | Nov 10 2017 22:23:08

[MOVIE/PACK] Star Trek, Star Trek Into Darkness, Star Trek Beyond 2009-2016 1080p BluRay x265 10bit AAC 5.1/7.1-Tigole[UTR] (Sizes in post) | Megalinks MegaDB [MOVIE/PACK] Star Trek, Star Trek Into Darkness, Star Trek Beyond 2009-2016 1080p BluRay x265 10bit AAC 5.1/7.1-Tigole[UTR] (Sizes in post)

By request.

Name & Media info | Year | Size ---|---|---- Star Trek 2009 (1080p x265 10bit AAC 5.1 Tigole) | 2009 | 2.66 GB Star Trek Into Darkness 2013 IMAX (1080p x265 10bit AAC 7.1 Tigole) | 2013 | 2.71 GB Star Trek Beyond 2016 (1080p Bluray x265 HEVC 10bit AAC 7.1 Tigole) | 2016 | 2.71 GB + 630.56 MB Featurettes TOTAL | Megalinks MegaDB TOTAL | | 8.69 GB | Megalinks MegaDB 8.69 GB

MEGA | Zippyshare (.DLC, use JDownloader)

Any pass = the name of this subreddit.

Extract with 7zip/peazip/bandizip (windows), keka (mac), p7zip (linux).

If you're still having trouble extracting, you may have had CRC errors during the download process. Verify that the file integrity is intact by opening the .sfv file with QuickSFV. If you are using MEGAsync, try using the web client or JDownloader instead.

Star Trek Movies I-X 1979-2002 (1080p Bluray x265 HEVC 10bit AAC 7.1/5.1 Tigole) w/ Bonus Featurettes (Sizes in post)

[-] Zodep | 10 points | Nov 10 2017 22:27:55

Damn! Thanks again! I need to buy a new hard drive at this rate!

[-] C_McButterpants | 8 points | Nov 11 2017 01:02:42

If only there was some kind of concise well meaning phrase to express how I wish you an extended and flourishing existence... raises right eyebrow

Thank you.

[-] Werdbooty | 1 points | Feb 20 2018 01:21:07

Wyld Stallyns rule?

[-] viper8828 | 3 points | Nov 11 2017 03:35:29

i know ppl have mixed feelings but i honestly thing the 2009 star trek is the best one ever made, into darkness just didnt have it for some reason and star trek beyond wasnt amzing but much better than darkness - i was hoping for these!

[-] Sielle | 2 points | Nov 10 2017 23:01:01

Nice, any clue if Tigole has done the rest of the ST movies?

[-] ecchh | 5 points | Nov 10 2017 23:52:30

He has, but the torrents are not very well seeded. I'll do my best to grab them but I can't make any promises.

[-] Sielle | 3 points | Nov 11 2017 03:15:54

Good to know. I'll see if I can get them via torrents as well. Thanks for the info.

[-] ecchh | 2 points | Nov 20 2017 08:17:23

I've got them and I've added them to my queue. Expect them up in the next few days.

[-] Sielle | 1 points | Nov 20 2017 08:51:42

Nice. I've been trying to get them, but you weren't kidding when you said they weren't well seeded (Still working on 6, with zero seeders on 7 & 10) . Thanks.

[-] ecchh | 2 points | Nov 21 2017 04:42:51

No problem! It's ready!

[-] Sielle | 3 points | Nov 21 2017 05:35:14

Thank you kindly, was able to grab the last 3 I was missing. Thanks.

[-] kaching335 | 2 points | Nov 11 2017 02:22:48

Thanks a bunch!

[-] santzapaul | 2 points | Nov 11 2017 12:19:46

Thank You!

[-] reptarwilleatu | 2 points | Nov 14 2017 22:41:21

👍🏻

[-] rhunter99 | 1 points | Nov 10 2017 23:43:29

Noob question: what is the quality like between x265 and x264?

[-] ecchh | 6 points | Nov 10 2017 23:55:30

At identical bitrates, x265 is more efficient and of higher quality, meaning x265 can reach higher quality at smaller filesizes, meaning you can get files that look like this @ ~3GB

http://ibb.co/ib4fLw

http://ibb.co/bQv9DG

http://ibb.co/mz0btG

[-] rhunter99 | 1 points | Nov 10 2017 23:57:14

I very much appreciate your response. I've been collecting x264 rips and didn't realise I could save disk space by switching.

[-] ecchh | 4 points | Nov 11 2017 00:05:38

No problem! You can save space, but x265 is less compatible with hardware decoding solutions, and requires a lot more CPU horsepower to decode than x264, so just be aware of that.

[-] rhunter99 | 1 points | Nov 11 2017 00:07:15

Thanks for the tip. Are there any media boxes that can properly play the files? I imagine my old wd media box wont compatible

[-] NegativeKarmaForever | 6 points | Nov 12 2017 00:05:10

WD won't play x.265 (the codec is new-ish, and WD's firmware hasn't been updated in years, as the product was EOLd years ago). I have one and have played thousands of movies on it during the past 5-6 years. I really loved the device and its interface (hey! it has a file manager, you can move/copy/delete files with your remote).

At the beginning of 2017 I bought a Roku Ultra, which plays x.265. Its interface is much more simplified and geared towards watching online stuff, but it plays x.265 flawlessly (and also 4K - I wouldn't know about that, as I don't have a 4K TV set).

[-] rhunter99 | 2 points | Nov 12 2017 04:56:26

Yeah my wd is pretty old so I'm not surprised it can't play these newer formats. I'll have to keep an eye out for the roku

[-] ecchh | 3 points | Nov 11 2017 00:08:45

I'm not sure, I have a media PC so I don't really know much about other media boxes, but I know the Nvidia Shield will definitely play x265

[-] rhunter99 | 3 points | Nov 11 2017 00:09:48

Awesome I'll have to keep an eye out for one this black Friday.

Thank you again for responding

[-] clanton | 5 points | Nov 11 2017 02:18:29

I have an Nvidia Shield and it works wonders with x265

[-] rhunter99 | 1 points | Nov 11 2017 02:33:52

awesome!

[-] OtochimarU | 2 points | Apr 02 2018 02:02:21

I know this is kinda late but in theory, any box that can play 4k natively, should play x265. since that is what the 4k bluray uses for the video.

[-] bert0ld0 | 2 points | Nov 11 2017 07:51:58

thing is, x265 files are still rare but yeah gradually I am switching too thanks to Tigole! Amazing stuff

[-] bert0ld0 | 1 points | Nov 11 2017 07:54:01

how much is the size reduction more or lesswith x265? Half or more?

[-] ecchh | 1 points | Nov 20 2017 08:23:03

About 22% for x265 8bit, probably closer to 40% with x265 10bit