HomemadeCheesecake | 25 points
Added 3 more movies.
Samples : /#F!AiACA*[samples]*Dhb!LV09PkklcK76T39kyg9-Aw
(Remove *[samples]* from the above link)
Main Files
L :
aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56LyNGIVZbNjBGUFNdcWdHbEo0Sg==
K :
IUhGeU8xWlZ1d0VnWzYwRlBTXTE3Qk92OFpEMkln
Decode at b64 and remove stuff between [] from L and K (including [])
Cheers :)
[-] saintspidey67re | 5 points
I've always wanted to watch The Avengers as if it were a soap opera! -_-
It doesn't actually look like that. Soaps look like that because of the quick and shit lighting they do. Basically it looks more like LIVE tv.
These do not.
[-] GWARscientist | 5 points
Nah, old soaps looked that way because they were recorded on videotape at the 29.97 frame rate & SD pixel size .
35mm film records at 24 fps creating a dreamlike quality & is part of the magic of motion pictures.
60 fps works great for things like porn because it's closer to how our eyes input to the brain creating a stronger sense of realism .
[-] [deleted] | 1 points
[deleted]
[-] GWARscientist | 6 points
Every movie ever with the exception of the Hobbit trilogy is shot at 24fps.
[-] OrangeCarton | 3 points
You'll get a headache anyway after watching the last two.
[-] saintspidey67re | -1 points
Soap operas look the way they do because of the higher frame rate. That's why TVs that have "motion smoothing" or "clear motion rates" produce a "soap opera effect". They add in extra frames to make the picture look "smoother". You can look it up if you don't believe me.
[-] ParadoxalDream | 0 points
That's not really how it works, and each TV manufacturer has its own way of making that "technology" works. Most of them actually make your screen flash really fast to make the fast motion effect works.
[-] saintspidey67re | 1 points
I'm not talking about refresh rate. I'm talking about the motion smoothing that is auto enabled on most modern sets.
[-] ParadoxalDream | 5 points
That's also what I'm talking about, both are interconnected.
TV manufacturers falsy advertise high refresh rate on their mid to high-end TVs. The vast majority of TVs are 60Hz and some high-end models have 120Hz displays but when you see a TV being advertised as 120Hz it is almost guaranteed to be a 60Hz panel coupled with some proprietary technology (what you call 'motion smoothing', but each company gives it a different gimmicky name...) to make it look like 120Hz. When you see a high-end model advertised as being 240Hz, it's actually 120Hz with the same technology.
It's that 'motion smoothing' that creates the 'soap opera look' and like you said those 'fake refresh rate' are usually auto-enabled on most TV sets, so naturally most consumers associate high refresh rates with unnatural and cheesy looking images.
Peter Jackson didn't help to dissipate that misconception with his Hobbit trilogy. It was filmed in 48 FPS and touted as being the next revolution in cinema but it was poorly used and his overuse of bad looking CGI made the movies look like video games cutscenes, once again giving a bad rep to HFR content.
When done correctly HFR can look stunning. Ang Lee's Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk in 60 FPS is a good example. And I can't wait to see James Cameron's Avatar sequels and Andy Serkis' Animal Farm, all natively filmed in 60FPS.
But I digress, the point of my first comment was simply to point out that 'motion smoothing' is not necessarily achieved by adding extra frames like you claim. Most manufacturers use a technique that makes your screen flicker (that's why the image gets darker, the screen is actually 'off' half the time) and tricks your brain into thinking that the image looks smoother.
My Vizio does this by having one frame jump ~3-4 pixels to the left and up as well as to the right and down - totally visible when you pause it's annoying as fuck for little to no motion scenes.
It does this, I assume, so that the next single frame blends with it's predicted jumping around - making it LOOK smoother by making the whole thing look jumpy.
It does take that shittiness of 24/29fps panning away, which is nice.
Edit :Next time I'm sitting here with my dick beaters all bored I'll take a 120fps video of it. From 24" away (on a 65" 4k tv) you can no longer see it move, but it is.
Will this make them look like a soap opera?
[-] HomemadeCheesecake | 5 points
Check out the sample. I haven't watched any soap opera, so i don't know.
[-] gandalftheshai | 2 points
My GPU is shit cant handle this 60fps I keep getting grey squares every few seconds XD
[-] HomemadeCheesecake | 1 points
sorry to hear that man. do you have an hdtv? most modern sets are compatible with these
[-] gandalftheshai | 1 points
Nah its my laptop Its shit
What process/program do you use to interpolate these movies?
[-] HomemadeCheesecake | 2 points
MeGUI
This is great stuff! What can expect for part 3?
[-] HomemadeCheesecake | 2 points
[-] [deleted] | 1 points
My TV can do this, it gives a funky soap opera videotape effect to all programming
[-] joshmaaaaaaans | 1 points
Man I watched the gotg sample, that is really weird, lol, almost 3D.
Is the full thing a higher quality or is the sample same quality as the full movie?
[-] HomemadeCheesecake | 1 points
I split the sample from the source video :) I like the song; thought that it was a nice music video too XD
[-] joshmaaaaaaans | 1 points
ELO are great.
[-] Synyster-_- | 9 points | Nov 06 2017 16:16:12
For anyone who might be interested, you can watch almost anything live-interpolated to ~60fps if you use SVP4free with MPC-HC 32bit.
It probably won't look quite as good as this using the free version's automatic settings, but it's a massive improvement on 23.976/24/29.97fps video. Useful for if you don't have bandwidth/storage for 60fps alternates.
permalink
[-] HomemadeCheesecake | 5 points | Nov 08 2017 05:14:26
Yea sure, but you will need a heavier system to run it as it does its thing in realtime
permalink