[MOVIE] The.Mummy.2017.2160p.4K.Bluray.UltraHD.HDR.ENG.FR.x265 [31.5GiB]

Lightzmare | 27 points | Sep 30 2017 12:37:42

[MOVIE] The.Mummy.2017.2160p.4K.Bluray.UltraHD.HDR.ENG.FR.x265 [31.5GiB] | Megalinks MegaDB [MOVIE] The.Mummy.2017.2160p.4K.Bluray.UltraHD.HDR.ENG.FR.x265 [31.5GiB]

http://links.snahp.it/454TM2017 + IXpyWW1GMEp2ZmdPRFhBZ0RaeklXWHcK

Note: Decryption is what's next to the link and is encoded in base64.

[-] SubZorro | 1 points | Sep 30 2017 12:43:13

Subtitles for this movie:

The.Mummy.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT | Megalinks MegaDB The.Mummy.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

The.Mummy.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT (COLORED) | Megalinks MegaDB The.Mummy.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT (COLORED) - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

The.Mummy.2017.1080p.720p.HDRip-WEB-DL | Megalinks MegaDB The.Mummy.2017.1080p.720p.HDRip-WEB-DL - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

The.Mummy.2017.HD-TS.x264-CPG | Megalinks MegaDB The.Mummy.2017.HD-TS.x264-CPG - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

^This ^list ^of ^subtitles ^are ^taken ^from ^opensubtitles.org ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha

[-] Jake548675 | 1 points | Sep 30 2017 15:15:04

Damn, that's large for a single movie. Is 30GB normal for a 4k x265 BD rip?

[-] Lightzmare | 1 points | Sep 30 2017 15:25:28

Well I'm no expert especially when it comes to 4K AND | Megalinks MegaDB AND 265... But what I know is that this release is actually a capture, meaning that the guys captured the image using a HDMI capture card, with some crazy high encoding settings, in order to preserve the original quality...

It's a poor technique that can't be compared to an actual rip of the movie and which will produce results as such... A crazy high size for a 265 encode...

From the little I know, I'd say yes, this is normal as if it was a 264 encode, the size would probably be doubled for a movie of this resolution... However, the whole capture process really throws off the basics I know about all of it.

Maybe some other redditor with better knowledge can shed some light to it.

[-] Jake548675 | 1 points | Sep 30 2017 15:41:00

Thank you for this reply, didn't know this wasn't a rip but a capture.

[-] Lightzmare | 1 points | Sep 30 2017 16:01:46

Yup... It's kind of a "fake" thing, if you want.

[-] ruukuu | 1 points | Oct 02 2017 05:25:46

Bare in mind that this rip is in HDR as well, which would be why they're using higher bitrate settings. To (over)simplify it, lower bitrates compress similar colors into the same block of color, reducing the amount of data needed for that cluster of pixels and by extension, that frame. It all adds up.

Now, being that HDR is an expanded color gamut, lowering the bitrate too low (compressing the colors significantly) would be counter-productive to having HDR in the first place.

Also, being that the source is a capture via HDMI, there isn't really any reason to believe any quality loss as it's a digital signal and unless the player he's capturing from did any sort of tweaking/scaling/color temperature changes, the quality shouldn't be impacted.