[Movie] 2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) Blu-Ray Remux Linear PCM + separate Eng/Fre/Ger/Ita/Spa and Commentary AC3 Audio [Movie: 18.82 GB | Commentary: 204.4 MB | Other Languages: 477.0 MB each]

tiiiiimmmm | 49 points | Sep 20 2017 23:40:00

[Movie] 2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) Blu-Ray Remux Linear PCM + separate Eng/Fre/Ger/Ita/Spa and Commentary AC3 Audio [Movie: 18.82 GB | Commentary: 204.4 MB | Other Languages: 477.0 MB each] | Megalinks MegaDB [Movie] 2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) Blu-Ray Remux Linear PCM + separate Eng/Fre/Ger/Ita/Spa and Commentary AC3 Audio [Movie: 18.82 GB | Commentary: 204.4 MB | Other Languages: 477.0 MB each]

Link: Lm56LyNGIVFISSFUcmFzSCNTQ1NaSQ==

Key: IUE2RTRUQklDcmQ1SCFUcmFzSCNaeFo1RDV4N01R

Decode at https://www.base64decode.org/ and remove word !TrasH# (including the pound sign and exclamation point) from both the link and the key. You must type 'mega' before the link after you decode it.

2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) Blu-ray Remux with 5.1 Linear PCM English Audio, 5.1 AC3 English, French, Spanish, Italian, German tracks available separately + English Commentary.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/

Media Info

[-] chagmed | 11 points | Sep 21 2017 00:25:57

Open the pod bay doors, HAL

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 5 points | Sep 21 2017 00:30:04

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that

[-] chagmed | 5 points | Sep 21 2017 00:32:29

Still amazes me that Kubrick was able to do this before CGI

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 7 points | Sep 21 2017 00:38:43

CGI is overrated, I miss practical effects.

[-] chagmed | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 00:40:41

The separate English audio - of higher quality than the default audio stream?

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 01:09:41

No, it's a Lossy format used when the player can't handle Linear PCM. It's available if you need it or if you want to lower the file size.

[-] Frodo_Bomb | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 14:12:50

Tell that to the executives who ruined the prequel to The Thing from 2011. The filmmakers spent several months designing beautifully grotesque practical effects, trying to stay as true to the original as possible, and the executives saw the finished workprint and said "We hate it, not enough CGI, redo it and cover up all the practical effects with CGI"

And then the biggest complaint about the movie was the horrible CGI

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 16:48:37

I didn't know the filmmakers wanted to do the movie without the CGI monster, that would have been way better. You see the monster way too much in the new movie, the original was great because it was all tense standoffs since you never saw the Thing when it killed people and you didn't know who was real and who wasn't. Hollywood is filled with idiot execs which is why the film industry is kinda flailing right now and a bunch of the talent moved to TV.

[-] Frodo_Bomb | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 16:56:23

The movie was finished with 95% practical effects and 5% CGI to fill in the gaps, but the execs had them replace it with 100% CGI, and it's especially sad because they put so much thought and care into making the movie, and the practical effects looked sooo good while the CGI aged really poorly.

Here's a video that sums it up pretty well. I hope there's the untainted Workprint Edition of the movie floating around somewhere, I'd love to get my hands on it.

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 17:24:17

I would too, maybe the person with the myspleen account can help, that would be the most likely place it would exist. BTW if you're into horror preservations and fan-edits check out http://drsapirstein.blogspot.ca/

[-] Shanks01 | 2 points | Sep 21 2017 01:28:51

Gracias por la película :)

[-] cobalt-green | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 01:57:51

Can't wait to listen to the commentary, thanks!

[-] Frodo_Bomb | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 02:29:34

Thank you so much!! One of my all-time favorite films

[-] sauce_mixer | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 05:50:18

It is already down for me. How can this be. May there be a problem with the link?

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 08:40:58

Link is good, make sure you are following all the directions

[-] sauce_mixer | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 11:01:55

my bad, didnt read the link | Megalinks MegaDB link and key part. only saw the !Trash# in the key ;)

[-] [deleted] | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 08:52:15

The irony of the computer acting more human than the crewmen

[-] LemonKing326 | 1 points | Sep 21 2017 17:47:02

The decryption key didn't work for me when I went to the decrypted link, yes I took out the word !trash# and put mega before it.
It's easier if you just encode the key rather than the link.

[-] tiiiiimmmm | 2 points | Sep 21 2017 18:45:53

It also makes it easier for a bot to find so someone can request a take-down. It's working, I just went to the share and it's live, make sure you decode the key and remove '!TrasH#' from it also. I'm not going to make links more easily discover-able and therefore shorten their lifespan potentially.