iPhunwa2 | 139 points
If you're having trouble downloading from MEGA, or can't bypass the bandwidth limit, use ZippyShare with JDownloader. If you're unsure on how to download using JDownloader, read the post I made here.
Director(s) | Megalinks MegaDB Director(s): Edgar WrightWriter(s) | Megalinks MegaDB Writer(s): Edgar WrightCast | Megalinks MegaDB Cast: Ansel Elgort, Jon Bernthal, Jon Hamm, Eiza GonzálezPlot | Megalinks MegaDB Plot: After being coerced into working for a crime boss, a young getaway driver finds himself taking part in a heist doomed to fail.
^This ^summary ^is ^taken ^from ^imdb.com ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha
[-] C_McButterpants | 2 points
Thanks for this.
~~FYI _ Zippyshare link is for x264 version.~~
Ignore me, I'm a massive &#$%ole
http://links.snahp.it/272bd2017webfhd265 no it's not
[-] C_McButterpants | 2 points
Well that's got me flumoxed!...
This is what I see with that link
Where are you pointing?
That link contains both the x264 version and x265, all you have to do is scroll down a little bit more and it's high lighted in green.
[-] C_McButterpants | 2 points
Oh sweet tap dancing jesus!
I wish I could blame it on my colorblindness — but I'm just being a complete dunderflap today... cheers.
I got the MEGA link anyway; because it's just so darned small! Whad'ya know x265 is the future ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Baby Driver 2017 TS x264 - THESTiG | Megalinks MegaDB Baby Driver 2017 TS x264 - THESTiG -1 CD- Download SubtitleBaby.Driver.2017.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT-FORCED | Megalinks MegaDB Baby.Driver.2017.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT-FORCED -1 CD- Download SubtitleBaby_Driver_2017_TS_x264_-_THESTiG | Megalinks MegaDB Baby_Driver_2017_TS_x264_-_THESTiG -1 CD- Download SubtitleBaby.Driver.2017.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT | Megalinks MegaDB Baby.Driver.2017.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT -1 CD- Download SubtitleBaby.Driver.2017.TS.XviD-TiTAN | Megalinks MegaDB Baby.Driver.2017.TS.XviD-TiTAN -1 CD- Download Subtitle
^This ^list ^of ^subtitles ^are ^taken ^from ^opensubtitles.org ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha
[-] AjeebChutiya | 1 points
You the man!
[-] [deleted] | -10 points
[deleted]
[-] street0721 | 14 points | Sep 12 2017 14:07:04
N0w!!!!! this is 1 big reason to accept x265!!!!
permalink
[-] E_EqualsDankCSquared | 3 points | Sep 14 2017 05:18:00
What's the difference between 265 and 264?
permalink
[-] HarryTheCaveman | 3 points | Sep 15 2017 15:26:04
From what I've gathered, x265 is more efficient so quality/filesize ratio is better. At higher bitrates it is far less noticeable. This site has great explanation and comparable screencaps.
permalink
[-] MetalHaus | 2 points | Sep 12 2017 14:58:04
so I should not be able to tell the difference from this and the 3.9gb file, if so i'm very much on board
permalink
[-] Arcademic | 4 points | Sep 12 2017 16:15:39
i don't think this is as good as a 4gb h264 encode, less than third the size would be insane
permalink
[-] GldRush98 | -4 points | Sep 12 2017 17:44:19
No, x265 encoding software is not at the same level as x264 encoders. X264 produces better results. Also, watch your cpu usage while playing this vs. a x265 file.
permalink