[MOVIE] The Matrix Trilogy 1999-2003 (1080p Bluray x265 HEVC 10bit AAC 5.1 Tigole) [13.22GB]

x265KiP | 169 points | Sep 06 2017 01:35:25

[MOVIE] The Matrix Trilogy 1999-2003 (1080p Bluray x265 HEVC 10bit AAC 5.1 Tigole) [13.22GB] | Megalinks MegaDB [MOVIE] The Matrix Trilogy 1999-2003 (1080p Bluray x265 HEVC 10bit AAC 5.1 Tigole) [13.22GB]

Use Base64Decode to get K

K: IXBXdEtFZ0dBVExfZkFWbGtVRUlQNGc=

ZippyShare Mirror

~Enjoy!!

[-] ecchh | 8 points | Sep 06 2017 02:47:15

Thanks a lot! Thanks doubly for the zippyshare links.

[-] Axelstrife | 4 points | Sep 06 2017 02:06:21

Thanks

[-] Demiglitch | 4 points | Sep 06 2017 08:36:46

Woah

[-] C_McButterpants | 3 points | Sep 06 2017 10:26:19

'Hey Ted. When we gonna release part 3 dude'

[-] chagmed | 3 points | Sep 06 2017 01:37:37

thanks

[-] _Stealth_ | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 12:32:57

How does this compare to my existing x264 which are 13gb EACH?

[-] Pirate321 | 4 points | Sep 06 2017 12:45:14

this one is x265 not x264

edit:

it's more quality and less size basically

500MB x265 video is almost always better than 1GB x264 video if you compare two 720p videos (or two 1080p videos)

[-] nicolaai823 | 1 points | Sep 06 2017 13:09:16

Could you please explain why?

[-] Pirate321 | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 13:19:51

Can't say much about it but from my experience 1GB file with x265(HEVC) encode is always better then 1GB x264 file

you can read this for more http://wp.xin.at/archives/3465

[-] nicolaai823 | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 13:23:30

Thank you!

[-] doot_doot_doot_doo | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 12:36:24

yeah, I'd like to know that as well. I don't have the 13gb ones, but I have some older x264 scene releases. If it's mostly comparable, I'll ditch the bigger ones.

[-] ashm909 | 1 points | Sep 06 2017 16:50:43

It's going to be a big loss in quality. Even with the efficiency upgrade of x265, a well-encoded x264 rip 4-6 times the size will be much better.

[-] doot_doot_doot_doo | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 17:36:56

thanks, confirmed some of my suspicions. I think I'll grab it and take a look either way.

Back of the napkin type math, what size would a comparable x265 rip to a 10GB well encoded x264 (like Sparks). Is that ratio linear? As in, if I grab some 18gb Grym x264 rips I'd need a similar 265/264 ratio to get same/similar quality

[-] Jlx_27 | 1 points | Sep 08 2017 20:32:18

That is not necessarily true, it all depends on the coding and compression

[-] ishadow2013 | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 18:08:42

Thanks :D!

Getting some movies while I'm sitting ducks in hurricane irma :(

[-] MiniTick | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 18:13:00

Stay safe friend, and godspeed.

[-] ishadow2013 | 2 points | Sep 06 2017 19:03:42

Thanks!

Happy reddit-cake day !