[SPORTS] Mayweather Vs McGregor x264 1080P 3.67gb

[-] ForFrodo_ | -3 points | Aug 27 2017 11:43:39

x265 please

[-] akingcool | 7 points | Aug 27 2017 12:07:38

why do people care so much? like whats the difference? (genuine question as I dont know!)

[-] Sorrow446 | 10 points | Aug 27 2017 12:16:49

x265 is more efficient, so you can lower the video bitrate of a x264 video a bit, and not even notice the difference. A lot of people compress the shit out of x265. People mainly want it for the smaller sizes.

[-] akingcool | 1 points | Aug 27 2017 12:29:04

in that case why bother with 264 at all, strange!

[-] Sorrow446 | 12 points | Aug 27 2017 12:31:35

I'd use it more if people wouldn't always use such stupid bitrates most of the time - completely trashes the quality. Also, hardware support. More devices support x264 than they do x265.

[-] akingcool | 1 points | Aug 27 2017 12:32:24

ah i see now, thanks for educating me :)

[-] Mac10Pro | 2 points | Aug 27 2017 18:14:00

I'm always comparing my xh264 to my xh265 downloads and the xh265 always loses out on quality. I had 'Logan' xh265 which clocked in under 10gb, and then downloaded a xh264 version which was approx 30gb, safe to say the difference was massive. xH265 high quality videos aren't common at all. I usualyl always see 2-3gb x265 links

[-] Apansy | 1 points | Aug 31 2017 09:38:27

That's down to a bad comparison. If you compare the same bit rates/file size then x265 will win quality every time.

[-] Mac10Pro | 1 points | Aug 31 2017 11:00:43

I know, but that's the problem, x265 is encoded for people with low bandwidth/slow internet speeds, hence why the majority of x265 links on this site are all averaging 2-3gb...

[-] venom7107 | 2 points | Aug 27 2017 20:28:00

A potato can run x264. The same isn't true for x265.

[-] Kaoulombre | 1 points | Aug 27 2017 16:43:34

It's mostly because people want to have the choice of quality.

265 is very good without stupid bitrates, most of them are top notch, and very small. But, you need a good computer to get the most of it.

i7, gtx980 4go, runs smoothly and it's so beautiful. I'm gonna get some rocks for this but, sometimes I find the 265 quality better than 264

[-] ForFrodo_ | -1 points | Aug 27 2017 12:15:49

size of download is lower with no risk in audio nor video quality

better for slow download people like myself as i get 200kbps max download speed

[-] Mac10Pro | 3 points | Aug 27 2017 11:48:36

Sorry I didn't make the video, I just provided a link. There should be one hopefully by the end of the day.