Axelstrife | 46 points
Password is the name of this sub reddit.
Enjoy.
wowowowowowowowowowowow i was waiting for this.... except for the part of the size of this o.o
[-] theUsernamist | 0 points
what do you mean? it's a blu ray rip, what do you expect?
[-] whywhywhyisthis | 6 points
He expects any of the modern technology used to reduce size while keeping bitrate and quality high?
[-] Seesyounaked | 1 points
Just curious as an idiot who downloads a lot of movies... I've gotten a ton of 1080p videos between 1 and 2 gigs.
This file is 18... That's huge compared to what I'm used to. Is the quality going to completely blow my mind if I download it?
[-] whywhywhyisthis | 3 points
The feature you're looking at is bitrate; what the other guy should've had said instead of condescendingly asking 'WHAT DID YOU EXPECT?' which is particularly hilarious given the average size of movies posted here is certainly not 20GB, is that the bitrate is the important aspect of all rips that separates good ones from trash. The chances are your 1-2GB rips don't have particularly exceptional bitrates. It's possible but it usually takes a few more GB. I would say people grabbing 20GB movies at a time will just find themselves filling more and more hard drive space, since tremendous quality and high bitrates can be found, especially coupled with 265 codec, in packages well under 18GB...
Thank you for your insightful comment. How can I tell which files would have the best bit rate at the lowest size? Is there an easy way to identify better quality videos at a glance?
[-] whywhywhyisthis | 2 points
It's a gamble. You don't need 20GB rips of movies but be prepared to spend some more gigs to ensure the coding was most likely acceptable. And look for the source- blu or otherwise. x264 codec is "pricey" size-wise but usually ensures good quality if you can "spend" the GB. x265 is far superior if and only if it's been encoded well which is definitely a gamble. Some contributors here actually post the bitrates in descriptions so check for those. Couple MB/s is usually good. This rip is actually 20. But with diminishing returns- well encoded x265 could look this good around 4-6GB.
[-] theUsernamist | 1 points
It's a straight bluray rip, that's like going to the store and buying a bluray movie, but you find out the audio quality is low and the quality could be better. It's a bluray rip, not a re-encode of anything.
I personally own a 50" plasma with studio monitors, so that "little bit of quality" thats going to "blow my mind" does.
/u/seesyounaked
[-] whywhywhyisthis | 1 points
Bro its literally semantics. I watch my stuff on a 65" 1080, and I don't need to spend 20GB on rips to see and enjoy the quality.
Why doesn't it say "Remux" in the title if its untouched? That's what that is is it not?
[-] theUsernamist | 1 points
Most likely from lack of titling. I've noticed some of these releases on here are titled wrong, I found a top gear episode being "HDTV" even though when I googled the release title (and made sure it was the same size) it was really web-rip.
If 18gb's isn't untouched and you do believe it, your crazy.
You also didn't list what kind of TV you have. There are so many shitty off brand TV's that have colors wacked out all over the place.
20GB's is seriously not much compared to the heavy price tag of my TV.... and delete it after.
[-] whywhywhyisthis | 1 points
It's an LG 120hz from a year or two back. I'm not here to play "my tv is better than yours" I'm here to tell these people there's almost NO real need for 20GB movie files, period.
[-] theUsernamist | 1 points
I wasn't saying your tv is better than mine. You also still didn't answer my question, 120hz monitors aren't impossible to make and I've seen budgets with shitty colors.
What I was saying is that on nice TV's, you will notice it.
Most smaller repack's take it, and re-encode it along with some scripts to make it "look better". I like my release raw and untouched.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/6gbukn/john_wick_chapter_2_quality_comparision_12gb_x264/
[-] whywhywhyisthis | 1 points
I didn't say monitor I said TV? Also they make 144hz monitors?
[-] theUsernamist | 1 points
monitor's and tv are practically the same, slight typo.
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 2017 HDTC LKRG | Megalinks MegaDB Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 2017 HDTC LKRG -1 CD- Download SubtitleGuardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.720p.HDTC | Megalinks MegaDB Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.720p.HDTC -1 CD- Download SubtitleGuardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG | Megalinks MegaDB Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG -1 CD- Download SubtitleGuardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.720p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS | Megalinks MegaDB Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.720p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS -1 CD- Download SubtitleGuardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 mp4- Resync Subs | Megalinks MegaDB Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 mp4- Resync Subs -1 CD- Download SubtitleGuardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.720p.WEB-DL.H264.AC3-EVO | Megalinks MegaDB Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.Vol.2.2017.720p.WEB-DL.H264.AC3-EVO -1 CD- Download Subtitle
^This ^list ^of ^subtitles ^are ^taken ^from ^opensubtitles.org ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha
what's the link password?
[-] Axelstrife | 2 points
"Password is the name of this sub reddit."
[-] Angrathar | 3 points | Aug 19 2017 01:41:36
Link is down
permalink
[-] Axelstrife | 1 points | Aug 19 2017 07:46:38
Back up now.
permalink