[META] They should change this subreddit name to

[-] ultrapan | 35 points | Jul 17 2017 10:15:59

Shit post with a clickbait title? GTFOH

[-] AReallyScaryGhost | 20 points | Jul 17 2017 10:31:20

Ok, i will see myself out

With a "joke" that horrible, you should.

[-] iliketoqq | 11 points | Jul 17 2017 11:06:52

at least they contain actual megalinks

[-] deadashellhp | 5 points | Jul 17 2017 20:52:14

Yo mama

[-] zyme_ | 4 points | Jul 17 2017 10:53:23

Personally I like here for more that is higher quantity of x265/HEVC selections then several private trackers I maintain membership with, even seems to rival most popular public trackers -- and they don't have regular link pruning. it is outdone with their own megalinks either or additionally public tor trackers on some scene groups individual web pages (like psa).

[-] zyme_ | 2 points | Jul 17 2017 11:42:46

...Speaking of which, [HEVC] allow me to slide off topic a tad since there are some wastes of HEVC due to re encoding from sources much lesser than the original, leading to files that are much bigger then the video could have been - eating up lots more CPU and compatible with many less devices for playing and averaging close to the size and quality of what x264 could be at the same size. and a reencode from bluray could be better while 50% or less the size

Not trying to sound like and advertisement more a shock and micro-review of sorts: I actually tested out the latest DivX Pro HEVC, and the converter seems to do a much faster job, higher quality conversion and smaller size than the highly popular+easy to use [free] Handbrake. I was surprised* and recommend it for any average user who lacks years of command line encoding practice and scene release quality encodes. [or as my needs were, for a parents with their several hundred 1GB+ each 12-min ~approx~ long 640x480 vacation video clips].

Handbreak has simple presets and plenty of options and the one quality encoders guide to using it stated that you need to run through all the major options and compare them because it can't predict what will be the better type for the video - Divx is idiot proof, without having a multiple pass option, just a Faster/less efficient to slower/more efficient (6 options I think along the sliding scale) and it killed 15 different attempts from the recommended settings through all the alternative modes in the the placebo and neighboring options.
the CCv2Ultra supports HEVC as well as android apps, ios with hdmi, iOS/TVOS ATV4's through apps, my traditional $30 (when new) cc2's can play any unsupported format anyway through prerendering in the background using the chrome browser or OS (in the background, generally unnoticably) besides multiple live transcoding alternatives that eat up tons more (c/g)pu power like plex, divx media server, etc..
And future backwards compatibility reminds me that the only h.263 videos google's cc v.2 is compatible with is Divx, not xvid (shouldn't that be the reverse, since Divx has licensing costs?)

[-] PenetratorHammer | 4 points | Jul 18 2017 00:17:30

kys fam