LossyLess | 55 points
aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56LyNGITg2WkF5SkxUIVJHMTd4MTExNU1aTk1EbTJsdktQZFENCg==
https://www.base64decode.org/
[-] IgnoreMyName | 3 points
Difference between this and this upload by /u/vcdupper?
27gb difference. Also despecialized edition is under 20gb too. Why are these editions bigger files than despecialized?
The despecialized edition..while beeing a very good and well made version is a compilation of different sources including the official Blu Rays, steady frames, inferior and incomplete low grade versions... This on the other hand is a direct scan from the original 35mm source without any compromised influences from the special editions...besides maybe the reduction of noise or negative effects based on erosion..So this here is clearly the superior Version and it comes closest to the Original 1977 Theater Cut!! (even Harmy (who is a god among men), the Maker of the Despecialized Edition is approving this one over his current Cut)
[-] Frodo_Bomb | 1 points
Because it's not as compressed to reduce file size
[-] IgnoreMyName | 1 points
Despecialized is compressed?
[-] Frodo_Bomb | 1 points
All the despecialized editions are each a little over 20gb, so if you saw some under 20gb then they must've been compressed. Also, keep in mind that all the despecialized editions are all 720p so they'd naturally have a smaller file size since the video only takes up around 40% of the space that a 1080p version would theoretically take up.
[-] IgnoreMyName | 1 points
Totally forgot about the 720p thing. Still, they look absolutely beautiful.
It depends on the encoder settings. With the right encoder settings, it's actually possible to have a decent-looking 1080p, x264-encoded movie with a 1 or 2 GB file size (certainly less than 5). For example:
1.72 GB: https://www.reddit.com/r/megalinks/comments/5u566s/movie_the_mist_2007_1080px264172gb/
Compare with: 12.93 GB: https://www.reddit.com/r/megalinks/comments/691qy4/movie_the_mist_2007_1080p_ac3_51_x264_1293gb/
Links for the 1st one are probably dead, but I checked it a while back and the picture quality seemed fine to me.
Director(s) | Megalinks MegaDB Director(s): George LucasWriter(s) | Megalinks MegaDB Writer(s): George LucasCast | Megalinks MegaDB Cast: Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Alec GuinnessPlot | Megalinks MegaDB Plot: Luke Skywalker joins forces with a Jedi Knight, a cocky pilot, a wookiee and two droids to save the galaxy from the Empire's world-destroying battle-station, while also attempting to rescue Princess Leia from the evil Darth Vader.
^This ^summary ^is ^taken ^from ^imdb.com ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha
[-] Highlander1536 | 1 points
Do you or anyone have the Despecialized IV New Hope Bluray ISO?
Someone put up the other 2 Isos but newhope was an MKV
[-] [deleted] | 1 points
So all the negative1 versions of the star wars movies are supposed to be "the definitive" star wars encodes?
[-] TheAmnesiacKid | 1 points
Thank you so much! This is an incredible effort. I'm confused, however. Has Team Negative released V and VI?
[-] Frodo_Bomb | 5 points | May 08 2017 15:06:05
whats the best way to
permalink
[-] mega4me | 2 points | May 08 2017 17:23:37
you could use eac3to...
https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=125966
This should explain how to prepare the files: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/xf1/11390793/raw/
Then just mux the video/audio/subs/chapters together with mkvmerge.
permalink
[-] [deleted] | 1 points | May 12 2017 04:10:14
[deleted]
permalink
[-] mega4me | 1 points | May 12 2017 04:56:57
yes, eac3to deals with multiple .m2ts file movies (called seamless-branching) perfectly, just follow the guide properly (it
permalink