[MOVIE] La.La.Land.2016.1080p.WEB-DL.x265-YSTeam [x265] [742MB] super^[1080p]

Aj-Mega | 45 points | Apr 11 2017 13:15:34

[MOVIE] La.La.Land.2016.1080p.WEB-DL.x265-YSTeam [x265] [742MB] super^[1080p] | Megalinks MegaDB [MOVIE] La.La.Land.2016.1080p.WEB-DL.x265-YSTeam [x265] [742MB] super^[1080p]

aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56LyMhbExoaEVRYkMhVXphZERXZ2J3Z1p0REtuR205MnhCUWhFSVNWRUxuSC1TU1hxdk9SVnNOZw== | Megalinks MegaDB aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56LyMhbExoaEVRYkMhVXphZERXZ2J3Z1p0REtuR205MnhCUWhFSVNWRUxuSC1TU1hxdk9SVnNOZw==
Paste encoded text into www.base64decode.org and press decode to get mega link.
Video Format: | Megalinks MegaDB Video Format: x265,MKV 10bit | Megalinks MegaDB 10bit
Audio Language: | Megalinks MegaDB Audio Language: English AAC 5.1
Subtitles: | Megalinks MegaDB Subtitles: None
File Size: | Megalinks MegaDB File Size: 742MB
Resolution: | Megalinks MegaDB Resolution: 1912 x 744
Encoder: | Megalinks MegaDB Encoder: YSTeam
Source: | Megalinks MegaDB Source: 1080p.WEB-DL.FGT

[-] Aj-Mega | 11 points | Apr 11 2017 13:22:56

NO | Megalinks MegaDB NO i wont do x264, sorry.

[-] iaxeuanswer | 1 points | Apr 12 2017 07:41:48

What is the bitrate?

[-] SubZorro | 3 points | Apr 11 2017 13:16:04

Subtitles for this movie:

La.La.Land.2016.DVDScr.XVID.AC3.HQ.Hive-CM8 | Megalinks MegaDB La.La.Land.2016.DVDScr.XVID.AC3.HQ.Hive-CM8 - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

La.La.Land.2016.KOR.DVDScr.720p.H264.AAC-Check | Megalinks MegaDB La.La.Land.2016.KOR.DVDScr.720p.H264.AAC-Check - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

Gary Numan Android in La La Land HDTV | Megalinks MegaDB Gary Numan Android in La La Land HDTV - 1 CD - Download Subtitle

^This ^list ^of ^subtitles ^are ^taken ^from ^opensubtitles.org ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha

[-] un_amigo | 2 points | Apr 11 2017 17:20:42

Just fyi, the source resolution is 1912 x 744.

[-] PastaLuke | 1 points | Apr 11 2017 16:00:39

is the quality just as good as the 4.3 gig 1080 versions?

Kinda a noob, sorry.

[-] Aj-Mega | 6 points | Apr 11 2017 16:30:07

Let's say in a perfect scenario, the 4.3gb was a 10. This version is a 8.5+

[-] WolfmanBeta | 7 points | Apr 11 2017 18:01:24

Blu ray rips ( around 10 gigs) -10/10

Web-dl rips (around 5 gb) - 8/10

H265 content like the one here - 6.5/10

Yify rips - 4/10

In short, don't expect high quality with low bit rate.

[-] [deleted] | 1 points | Apr 13 2017 22:28:14

[deleted]

[-] WolfmanBeta | 1 points | Apr 14 2017 03:50:10

"Why would that make it a 6.5. Or make it have a lesser bit rate necessary?"

x265 isn't so much better than x264 at high bitrates. A 500 MB H265 video will look as good as a 1 GB H264 video. But a 5GB H265 video won't look as good as a 10 GB H264 video. As the bit rate gets higher the savings become more insignificant (~15%)

I would give a 10/10 for 8 GB or 9 GB x265 file( while the x264 one is 10 gigs). But go anything lower than that and the difference becomes more apparent. 750 MB file sucks in comparison to a 10 GB file, obviously! The fact that it is x265 is not changing anything. Also, the way x265 handles banding at low bitrates is just atrocious. I think 6.5/10 is just right for the 750 MB file. x265 is great for streaming or one-time watch. But not something i would archive. If the compressed version looks great and you cannot find any difference, then by all means go for it.

"Do you even have a clue what you are talking about?"

LOL

[-] PastaLuke | 1 points | Apr 11 2017 16:30:59

That's a great way of explaining it! Thanks!